February 28, 2013

DRAFT PLANNING LEGISLATION

Here is an important message from the Better Planning Network. Your participation will help influence the outcome of the Draft Planning Legislation and secure your voice in local planning issues.


With the imminent release of the White Paper and the accompanying draft planning legislation, we have one last opportunity to influence the contents of these documents.

We know that before their release (some time in March), the White Paper and draft legislation will need to be discussed and endorsed by the NSW Cabinet (ie- all current NSW Ministers).

The White Paper and the draft legislation cannot be released until they have Cabinet endorsement.  We can influence this process and you have a powerful opportunity to do 2 things:

1/ Write/email/phone all NSW Cabinet members and make your views known as individuals and as local community groups; and
2/ If your state MP is a member of the Liberal party- write/email/phone them as well, and make your views known.

We must make our message clear to politicians!  To help with this process, we have attached a list of NSW Cabinet members, as well as some wording to guide your letters/phone calls.  If you have not got the time for a letter (and even if you do), you can also:

-          Email them some key bullet points
-          Phone them; or
-          Send a Votergram.  A Votergram is a 100 word message instantly delivered to all State MPs-  http://www.fairgo.org/campaigns.htm . 

Don’t under-estimate the power of writing/emailing/phoning as an individual.  Politicians can sometimes dismiss groups as ‘interest-based lobbies’ but they see all individuals as voters. 

To ensure maximum benefit and influence on the White Paper and draft legislation, we need to act ASAP and before 5 March at the latest.

It is much, much easier to influence outcomes before the White Paper is released  than afterwards, and it is therefore essential that we take up this opportunity.

Remember- we are together on this, and your letter, email or phone call will be one of hundreds, if not thousands. 

Feel free to contact us with questions.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT- WE ARE GROWING EVERY DAY IN STRENGTH AND INFLUENCE.


Kind Regards



Corinne Fisher
Ph: 0421 831 889

February 25, 2013

MAKE A SUBMISSION TO COBBORA MINE

Hello All,

Below is a quick submission guide prepared by Bev Smiles of the Mudgee District Environment Group to help generate a large number of objections to this major state-owned coal mine proposal in Central West NSW north of Mudgee.

 Please do not send the guide to the Dept of Planning - select some or all of the points provided and add some of your own words.
 
 Brief Background:
 The mine will extract 20 million tonnes of coal per year  (mtpa) to produce 12 mtpa saleable product. 9.5mtpa has been contracted to the Eraring and Vales Point power stations on the Central Coast (over 300km away) by Ian McDonald when Minister for Mining and Energy.

 The mine has a very large ecological footprint, large water demand and will have major social impacts. All this is happening with NSW taxpayers money.

 Thank you to all who sent in submissions of objection in December to the original project assessment. There has since been a Planning Assessment Panel hearing and now a revised project for public comment.

 Please add your voice to the objections to this monstrous proposal. All additional coal will be exported.

 Help NSW to quit coal.

 More information on this project can be found at:

 http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_job&job_id=3695 <http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/index.pl?action=view_job&job_id=3695>
 





Submission Guide
Cobbora Coal Project – Preferred Project Report
Application No: 10-0001

Submission deadline:  Friday 8 March

Label your submission as an objection, include your name, address and contact details




Key points of objection to Preferred Project Report (PPR):

1.     The economic assessment of the project and response to submissions has not adequately addressed the cost of a state-owned coal mine to the taxpayers of NSW.

2.     The project cannot guarantee a ‘reliable, secure and economically stable domestic coal supply (to)NSW generators’ nor can it guarantee ‘affordable electricity in NSW.’

3.     The justification for the mine is based on contracts negotiated by the ALP Govt as part of the Gentrader deal. These could be filled through other arrangements.

4.     The PPR does not justify the increase in water demand for mining operations from the previous prediction of 3,700 ML per year up to 4,340 ML per year.

5.     The increased pump rate from the Cudgegong River and access to higher natural flows has not been adequately assessed.

6.     The PPR will increase the area of destroyed woodland by 92 ha including an additional 11 ha of threatened ecological communities.

7.     The ecological footprint of the mine is too high and cannot be adequately offset. The PPR does not identify a final offset package because this is not achievable.

8.     The increased height of over burden emplacements by 20m will increase dust emissions. The air quality model needs to be redone using all available meteorological information.

9.     The proposal to implement the draft ‘Rail Infrastructure Noise Policy’ will disadvantage local residents affected by increased noise from the proposed rail loop.

10.  The issue of train length on the Ulan line has not been addressed as identified in the ARTC 2012 – 2020 Rail Corridor Capacity Strategy.


February 9, 2013

ODE TO RUNNING STREAM

Ode to Running Stream
by Kate Cowden

Quietness reigns, 'cept the frogs and the toads,
Running Stream tinkers o'er boulders, and knows
Flitting about after mayflies and gnats
Are robins and wrens, tree creepers and chats.

While summer's extremes give us fire and heat,
Our stream is a constant; clear, cold and sweet.
So green the pastures it waters downstream
To take it away from us: That would be mean.

Clear frosty mornings, spent mug in hand,
Pondering seasons and life on the land,
Scavenging firewood with wind in  your face,
Snow blankets all: winter's embrace.

What is that booming o'er gully and dale?
What could it be? It's turning me pale
"Tis distant thunder", says them on the street,
Yet no thunder I know can shake my feet!

"There's coal in them hills," the prospector's told.
No secret to us, we'd known it from old:
How money has power to minds enslave,
Better cars, bigger houses, the lifestyle they crave
(Did they stop to consider it if fit in their grave?)

What of our mountain, its springs and its snow,
Its future uncertain 'cause of coal down below,
Our mountain, its forest and stream that we love
Sings praise to its maker and God above.

China flags plan to cut coal use






February 7, 2013

John Garnaut 

China flags plan to cut coal use


<p>

CHINA'S decade-long boom in coal-driven heavy industry is about to end as the leadership shifts priorities towards energy conservation, say officials and policy advisers.

The advisers predict China's coal consumption will peak at only a fraction above current levels after the State Council, or cabinet, last week set an ambitious new total energy use target for the five-year plan ending in 2015.

''Coal consumption will peak below 4 billion tonnes,'' said Jiang Kejun, who led the modelling team that advised the State Council on energy-use scenarios.

''It's time to make change,'' said Dr Jiang, who is director of the Energy Research Institute under the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). ''There's no market for further development of energy-intensive industry.''

The imminent stabilisation of coal usage, if broadly achieved, would mark a stunning turnaround for a nation that is estimated to have burnt 3.9 billion tonnes last year, which is nearly as much as the rest of the world combined. The move would also bring some relief in the fight against global warming.

And it would trigger a negative income shock to Australia, the world's biggest exporter of coal and iron ore, with significant implications for government budget forecasts.

Dr Jiang said the energy targets would bite hardest with energy-intensive heavy industries such as steel - dependent on iron ore and coking coal - which he said had saturated their potential markets and could no longer make money.

Thermal coal-powered electricity generation would continue to expand at a low pace, he said.

In the first 12 years of this millennium, China increased annual coal use by a staggering 2.4 billion tonnes, or 163 per cent, accounting for more than four-fifths of global coal consumption growth.

In five years China's net coal imports have surged from negligible levels to about 200 million tonnes, driving up the international price.

Last year China bought 19.5 per cent of Australia's thermal coal exports worth $2.8 billion; 17.5 per cent of coking coal ($3.5 billion) and 72.5 per cent of iron ore ($38.6 billion), according to estimates by Kieran Davies, an economist at Barclays Bank.

Foreign energy analysts are mostly sceptical that China can meet its ''non-binding'' energy goal, pointing out that it missed its 2010 target by a large margin.

They are broadly unconvinced that the energy targets can be achieved without an intolerable drop in the GDP growth rate.

Chinese officials and analysts acknowledge that state-owned enterprises, regional leaders and their political patrons have resisted or ignored previous edicts.

But they say economic growth is now ready to be weaned from its addiction to coal and the State Council decision - including to apportion responsibilities to local governments and enterprises - shows a stronger political consensus has been reached to mobilise the bureaucracy.

Pan Jiahua, who heads a team of climate change economists at China's leading think tank, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told Fairfax Media that the State Council's endorsement of the energy target had the effect of elevating it into a ''political requirement''.
Professor Pan said energy security remained the primary motivation behind the measures, but last month's record pollution readings in North China had contributed to the hardening of political will. ''Chinese people have done enough tolerating such bad air,'' he said.
The State Council last week set a total primary energy consumption target (including renewable energy and transport fuel) of 4 billion tonnes of ''standard coal equivalent'' in the five years to 2015. Confusingly, one tonne of actual coal equates to about 0.68 tonnes of coal equivalent, according to Dr Jiang.

With two years of the plan period already used up, the target translates to annual growth in energy consumption of about 3.5 per cent over the next three years, down from 6.6 per cent a year in the five years to 2010.

Officials at NDRC have been telling visiting delegations in recent days that coal consumption will peak below 4 billion tonnes and the government would do ''whatever it takes'' to hit the energy use targets.

Posted for Fiona

February 8, 2013

Time for change: China flags peak in coal usage




February 6, 2013
John Garnaut 

Time for change: China flags peak in coal usage

China’s decade-long boom in coal-driven heavy industry is about to end as the leadership shifts priorities towards energy conservation, say officials and policy advisers.

The advisers predict China’s coal consumption will peak at only a fraction above current levels after the State Council, or cabinet, last week set an ambitious new total energy use target for the five-year plan ending 2015.

“Coal consumption will peak below 4 billion tonnes,” Jiang Kejun, who led the modelling team that advised the State Council on energy use scenarios, told Fairfax Media.

“It’s time to make change,” said Dr Jiang, who is director of the Energy Research Institute under the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). “There’s no market for further development of energy-intensive industry.”

The move would also bring some relief in the fight against global warming.

Income shock for Australia

And it would trigger a negative income shock to Australia, the world’s biggest exporter or coal and iron ore, with significant implications for government budget forecasts.

Dr Jiang said the energy targets would bite hardest with energy-intensive heavy industries such as steel - dependent on iron ore and coking coal - which he said had saturated their potential markets and could no longer make money.

Thermal coal-powered electricity generation would continue to expand at a low pace, he said.

In the first 12 years of this millennium, China increased annual coal use by a staggering 2.4 billion tonnes, or 163 per cent, accounting for more than four-fifths of global coal consumption growth.

In five years China’s net coal imports have surged from negligible levels to about 200 million tonnes, driving up the international price.

Last year China bought 19.5 per cent of Australia’s thermal coal exports worth $2.8 billion; 17.5 per cent of coking coal ($3.5 billion) and 72.5 per cent of iron ore ($38.6 billion), according to estimates by Kieran Davies, an economist at Barclays Bank.

Foreign energy analysts are mostly sceptical that China can meet its “non-binding” energy goal, pointing out that it missed its 2010 target by a large margin.

They are broadly unconvinced that the energy targets can be achieved without an intolerable drop in the GDP growth rate.

Chinese officials and analysts acknowledge that state-owned enterprises, regional leaders and their political patrons have resisted or ignored previous edicts.

'Political requirement'

But they say the economic growth is now ready to be weaned from its addiction to coal and the State Council decision - including to apportion responsibilities to local governments and enterprises - shows a stronger political consensus has been reached to mobilise the bureaucracy.

Pan Jiahua, who heads a team of climate change economists at China's leading think tank, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told Fairfax Media that the State Council’s endorsement of the energy target had the effect of elevating it into a “political requirement”.

He said officials in local governments and state-owned enterprises would now be judged partly on their ability to meet energy targets while a long list of green slogans, incentives and policies were translating into concrete measures.

Professor Pan said energy security remained the primary motivation behind the measures but last month’s record pollution readings in North China had contributed to the hardening of political will.

“Chinese people have done enough tolerating such bad air,” he said.

The State Council last week set a total primary energy consumption target (including renewable energy and transport fuel) of 4 billion tonnes of “standard coal equivalent” in the five years to 2015. Confusingly, 1 tonne of actual coal equates to about 0.68 tonnes of coal equivalent, according to Dr Jiang.

With two years of the plan period already used up, the target translates to annual growth in energy consumption of about 3.5 per cent over the next three years, down from 6.6 per cent per year in the five years to 2010.

A proportion of the increase will be absorbed by hydro, wind, solar and nuclear – which are all benefiting from strong government assistance - at the expense of coal.

Officials at NDRC have been telling visiting delegations in recent days that coal consumption will peak below 4 billion tonnes and the government would do “whatever it takes” to hit the overall energy use targets.

Professor Pan predicted coal consumption would peak at less than 4.2 billion tonnes by 2015 while other global commodities markets would be hit at least as hard.

He said a continuing increase in coal-powered electricity generation would be offset by a production plateau in key heavy industries.

“I don’t think there will be further scope for expanding iron and steel production, or cement,” he said.

Professor Pan said there was no question the State Council would meet its target but he noted that  measurement methods were not robust.

“In some cases statistics may not be able to provide accurate information and some numbers may have to be estimates, which gives a certain degree of flexibility.”

Posted for Fiona